<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What You Almost Learned In School &#8211; 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://articlewritingnews.com/what-you-almost-learned-in-school-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://articlewritingnews.com/what-you-almost-learned-in-school-2/</link>
	<description>Article Writing and Marketing Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:07:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo de Jong</title>
		<link>http://articlewritingnews.com/what-you-almost-learned-in-school-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo de Jong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlewritingnews.com/?p=256#comment-44</guid>
		<description>A comment made in good humor and not meant to offend:  :)

&quot;for their–there–they’re sake .
(Homework: Which one should I have used?).&quot;   May I suggest their &#039;sakes,&#039; not &#039;sake&#039; i.e., unless they all have the same &#039;sake,&#039; which is not what I think you meant.

The second example, shown in &#039;Definitions,&#039; would be correct provided that we know that more than one person owns the hard drive.  I&#039;m too old to remember the rule verbatim, but it has something to do with agreement of number, I believe.

These tutorials are so good that I feel at liberty to point out minutiae without in any way detracting from their validity.  They are a wonderful way to pull a mind that has gone sloppy back to the fundamentals.  In any case, I thank you for your attempt to do something about these frequent and very annoying errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A comment made in good humor and not meant to offend:  <img src='http://articlewritingnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;for their–there–they’re sake .<br />
(Homework: Which one should I have used?).&#8221;   May I suggest their &#8216;sakes,&#8217; not &#8216;sake&#8217; i.e., unless they all have the same &#8216;sake,&#8217; which is not what I think you meant.</p>
<p>The second example, shown in &#8216;Definitions,&#8217; would be correct provided that we know that more than one person owns the hard drive.  I&#8217;m too old to remember the rule verbatim, but it has something to do with agreement of number, I believe.</p>
<p>These tutorials are so good that I feel at liberty to point out minutiae without in any way detracting from their validity.  They are a wonderful way to pull a mind that has gone sloppy back to the fundamentals.  In any case, I thank you for your attempt to do something about these frequent and very annoying errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

